It all began with an assassination 61 years ago.
That Day
In November of 1963, almost exactly two months after my wife and I were married at the University of Minnesota, I was in the midst of a Shakespeare class on the University of Minnesota campus when the assassination of JFK was announced. Everyone was shocked; the air was thick with disbelief. The usually bustling campus was eerily quiet as I walked home, my mind reeling, trying to comprehend the gravity of what had just happened.
My wife had been teaching a class of elementary students in one of the Minneapolis public schools, trying to keep things calm. When she arrived home, she joined me in front of the TV in our apartment near campus, and we watched for the next several days as we, with the rest of the nation, tried to make sense of the assassination and mourn a fallen leader, who represented such renewed hope for the nation.
Since that day our nation has slowly been taken on another path, one which is much more focused on the needs of an economic elite, with changes in the tax code, the weakening of collective bargaining for unions and the pro-business Supreme Court rulings, while deemphasizing the needs of the ordinary citizens of our democracy.
This shift, which might have been labeled a conspiracy had it come from the liberal left, was instead described as a ‘good business plan’ by its conservative architects. Those conservative elements that represented that economic elite encompassed businesses, corporations, the military-industrial complex and the secret elements of our nation which covertly support their bidding in the name of National Security.
None of this was very apparent to most of us at that time, except that the Warren Commission report left too many questions unanswered: the inconsistencies of eyewitness testimony, the one assassin theory, the one bullet theory, and the kill shot coming from the back, all of which challenged our common sense. As time went on it became clearer that the official explanation of that assassination was as much a coverup as a real investigation.
A Journalist’s Warning
A couple of years later in 1965/1966 as I found myself teaching high school in a small town in Michigan, my wife and I were invited to a dinner by some friends and at that dinner was a journalist who had recently returned from Vietnam. He described the assassinations that the CIA operatives were carrying out in Vietnam. After hearing what he was saying, I said, “Well what would happen if the CIA began to do that here?’ His answer was, “What makes you think they haven’t?” That totally stopped the conversation as his response began to sink in.
(If you support this kind of writing please consider a free or paid membership.)
The Motivation for the Quiet Coup
The quiet coup was, in reality, a plan to reestablish control over the levers of government in the US by the economic elite which had dominated government since the very beginning of this nation. With the coming of FDR and his New Deal, control of those levers had been shifted to be more democratically controlled by the citizens of the nation. In other words, the purpose of government had shifted to be in service of the citizens rather than being in service to business and the economic elite. But the new plan of that economic elite was to shift the focus back to economics, deregulating business with new economic and tax programs and solidifying that control so as never to lose it again.
The economic elite hated FDR and fought the New Deal, tooth and nail, with the help of a very conservative Supreme Court. That economic elite began to gradually reclaim some of their dominance by the end of FDR’s administration. That process continued under Truman and seemed to begin to be solidly reestablished under Eisenhower, but the election of JFK appeared to jeopardize those gains.
As JFK continued in office, it became clear that things were returning to a “New Deal”, more democratizing ideology. After the Bay of Pigs fiasco, perpetrated on the new president by the Eisenhower CIA with Alan Dulles as head, Kennedy fired Dulles and was about to dismantle the CIA. Later, Kennedy was beginning to pull out of Vietnam, and after the Cuban Missile Crisis, had found ways to perhaps end the Cold War by finding a détente with Russia and Cuba. All of these things began to look like a return to the democratizing elements of the New Deal, a possible end to the Cold War and potentially an end to the dominance of the economic elite once again.
After the JFK assassination, as we all know, the war in Vietnam continued for several more years, to the benefit of the military-industrial complex, the power of the CIA continued, the possibility of a détente with Russia and/or Cuba dissolved, and the Cold War with its arms race, continued to be the focus of our foreign policy. And, to top it all off, Alan Dulles was part of the Warren Commission.
The Beginning of the Quiet Coup
As that economic elite watched what JFK was doing, it would appear that a decision was made within their ranks that the gloves must come off and that it was time to do whatever was necessary to assure that the economic elite would never again lose control of those levers of power.
Within the 1960s, four key leaders of the democratizing resurgence were tragically and systematically assassinated. The antiwar movement became powerful, and the discontent of the citizenry was on full display. And finally, the fiasco of the Democratic National Convention and the police riots of Chicago in 1968 shifted the election toward Richard Nixon and his “law and order” agenda and definite pro-business stance.
Then, in August of 1971, the Powell Memorandum to the National Chamber of Commerce weaponized business to become politically involved, lobbying, influencing tax policies, and becoming more directly involved in governmental economic decisions. The result was to shift the nation and the political process toward economic priorities and away from the priorities of a democracy; to government serving the economic elite rather than the ordinary citizens of this nation. Incidentally, soon after that memorandum, Lewis Powell was appointed to the Supreme Court.
The shift continued apace, gradually changing taxes from progressive to regressive, a process of deregulation and privatization of public functions, practically destroying labor unions and producing an obscene income inequality along with the dominance by a society of billionaire oligarchs.
Finishing the Job
We are now at the culmination of that quiet coup, with the election of Donald Trump, the quintessential oligarch, now finishing the job of institutionalizing a government whose sole purpose is to serve the interests of the economic elite by debasing all other elements of government, including the support of justice, to make those other elements dysfunctional and meaningless. We can expect more deregulation, more tax breaks for the economic elite, more pro-business Supreme Court Rulings and less concern for fairness, equality and inclusiveness. This next four years will be spent normalizing those changes.
The Quiet Coup that began with the assassination of JFK has continued apace culminating in the election of an oligarch to dismantle what was left of a democracy which might serve the ordinary citizens.
Thus, the Quiet Coup is complete; the democratic government of the US has been quietly overthrown to be replaced by a government now servicing free market capitalism and an economic elite of billionaire oligarchs.
The Quiet Coup may be complete, but democracy’s fate now depends on whether the collective will of ordinary citizens can rise once more to challenge this imbalance of power.
Rob
Absolutely right on. It is time for a true bottom-up citizens movement. It is a time for a call on an empowered citizenry.
By the way, I don't know if you are familiar with a book I wrote in 2016 about the 2016 Presidential election, describing many of the elements that have led to our dysfunction since. If you send me your address, I will send you a copy, or you can get it on Amazon.
Keep the faith.
Excellent historical narrative summary, Bob!
Among the next steps, I believe we should make more visible to the public the fact that only 1 in 4 technically eligible U.S. voters voted for Trump. We need to be reminded of how many Americans are not registered to vote - and how many registered voters declined to vote in this last national election.
Also, we need to make visible the fact that, since the 1970s, upward mobility of U.S. families has been steadily declining and undermining the hope that successive generations will do better than the last.
And, as you have already mentioned, we need to make visible the inexorable transfer of wealth from the 90% of Americans to the wealthiest 10% over the past 50 years - characterized by a worsening Gini Coefficient (approaching that of a "third world" country).
We need to build a broad, diverse, movement based on these realities and develop policies that will "make America great again". - Rob